4. What is the basis for both Laertes' and Polonius' objections to Ophelia's relationship with Hamlet? Which of their arguments seems most and least persuasive or fair? What does their treatment of Ophelia in act 1 scene 2 reveal about their motivations? What does it suggest about their attitude toward Ophelia and toward women in general? How does class or station function in their arguments?
The fundamental reasoning behind Laertes' objections to Ophelia's relationship with Hamlet mainly lies in true care and concern for his sister while Polonius' objections lie mainly in his concern for his image and his power. Laertes' advice can be seen as a true desire for the well being of his younger sister. As he addresses the possibilities of heartbreak for Ophelia if she does engage in a further relationship with Hamlet, his intentions are clear. Though the reader can also conclude his fondness of authoritativeness in undermining a woman, we can mainly see that the emotional and physical well being of his sister matters to him. In opposition, Polonius shows the readers and audience the extensive power trip that he is on as he takes advantage of his obedient daughter. More than anything, Polonius desires the best for himself at the cost of any of this children. This is clearly seen as Polonius objects to Ophelia's relationship with Hamlet initially, but over time, as he realizes his own benefits in the relationship, decides to "loose" his daughter unto the protagonist. The only reason for Polonius' original problems with the relation between Hamlet and Ophelia was only for the sake of his own ego and authoritative persona. The selfishness and unnecessarily controlling basis of Polonius' advice to Ophelia is evident through his actions before, during, and after the "advice" he provides his daughter, thus making his argument wholly, less fair, reasonable, and persuasive.
Both the men's treatment of Ophelia in Act 1 Scene 2 demonstrate the inferiority of women to men in early English society. Both father and son expect Ophelia to follow their "more expert" advice. Also, Polonius' controlling diction gives the reader the clear idea that he enjoys his daughters obedience to his every command while Laertes' seems more mellow of his advice, yet still exhibits a good amount of superiority in his desires than those of his sister.
Overall, Polonius and Laertes both reveal sufficient evidence to conclude their view of women and the basis of their objections to the relationship between Hamlet and Ophelia. As overpowering men, they are quick to demand Ophelia's subordination to their advice. However, while Laertes' motivation is more pure, Polonius illustrates a rather convoluted motive.
No comments:
Post a Comment